An Addition to the Harry Potter Posts
This news article covers an interview with the author of Harry Potter- J.K. Rowling. I think it's quite interesting: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1572107/20071017/index.jhtml
This news article covers an interview with the author of Harry Potter- J.K. Rowling. I think it's quite interesting: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1572107/20071017/index.jhtml
For those of you expecting better of me-- there are only two things on my mind right now. 1. Getting a new job. 2. Harry Potter. Finding out about the first one today-- so I might blog about that later; and finding out about the second tomorrow-- and I'll definitely blog about that later.
I missed a couple of important things on this cover in the last post, so I thought I'd cover them here quickly.
Krum is an interesting character, isn't he? Obviously an excellent flier, and sympathetic to the Hogwarts cause of, er, being against Voldemort. Plus he has the hots for Hermione. And I think that she definitely had the hots for him back, at least a little bit, even while she liked Ron. The evidence is in-- they've certainly kissed, and they've maintained contact, although it does not look like Hermione spent the summer with him after he asked.In less than 20 days, we'll find out. But . . . I think it's gotta be Harry. There is just no way that he can fight the Dark Lord-- the most powerful wizard of all time, kill all of that guy's souls, and survive. I am also thinking back to something in the Sorcerer's Stone. . .

When Harry is serving detention in the Forbidden Forest, he nearly encounters Voldemort himself, cloaked in black and drinking unicorn blood. When Voldemort realizes Harry's presence, he turns and swoops toward him, only to be stopped by a Centaur, who allows Harry to ride his back to effect Harry's escape.
When the Centaur encounters other Centaurs, they become very angry with him for not letting Harry face Voldemort. Now this can be interpreted in various ways, but I think Harry says it himself, when he stumbles out of the forest muttering that the Centaurs believe he is fated to die at the hands of Voldemort.
People have mentioned that Harry Potter is one of Voldemort's horcruxes. This might be supported. For example, in the Order of the Phoenix when Harry has the "vision" of the snake attacking Mr. Weasley, there are three important things to note. 1) that Harry had the vision as the snake, 2) that later Harry wanted to attack Dumbledore and complained to Sirius that "it's like there's a snake inside me!" and 3) when Dumbledore's instrument indicates 1 snake, and Dumbledore asks "in essence divided?" and the 1 snake divides into two-- we really have no clue what it means. It could mean that the instrument is replying to Dumbledore's question with a no-- "No, sir, there really were two snakes." or it could mean that "Yes, one snake but in essence divided." So what are the two essences? Dumbledore believes it was Nagini as Horcrux and Voldemort possessing her, but maybe it was Harry as Horcrux and Nagini as Horcrux.
Anyway, say Harry really is a Horcrux . . . or say he isn't. Either way, I kind of think that a Dementor and its kiss will somehow be involved in the riddance of that last Horcrux. Maybe Voldemort kills Harry but is hit with a stunner spell or something and the Dementor swoops in. Or maybe Harry kills Voldemort but is incapacitated and the Dementor swoops in on him? Gasp! Maybe this happens and the Dementor sucks out Voldemort's soul from Harry the Horcrux and Harry lives!
Maybe the New York subways, instead, will rave that "Harry Lives!" instead of lauding their old appreciation for Frodo . . . [For those of you who fail to read introductions, this is a reference to Peter Beagle's 1973 introduction to The Lord of the Rings.]
I am still trying to figure out my theory . . . Thus, in my spare time (usually after I can no longer do homework and need to wind down) I've been re-reading the books. I recently found something very interesting in the 1st book-- Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone-- but I might try to discuss that later. Anyway, since I know that probably none of my 3 readers actually read Harry Potter, I'll break it down for you in a list. That way when you enter Barnes and Noble and find the little tri-cornered pamphlet on the table you can have an intelligent conversation with the strange-looking person dressed in a violet cloak.
Snape is good:
Snape is bad:
Recent Comments